written by
Dorea Hardy

Every Course Shouldn’t Feel Like a Different Planet

Instructional Design 4 min read , May 1, 2026

The Mental Reset Students Didn’t Sign Up For

Imagine walking into your office one morning and everything has been rearranged.

Your desk is on the opposite wall. Your files are in different drawers. The tools you use every day are technically still there… but not where you expect them to be. You could figure it out, of course, but it would slow you down, frustrate you, and make even simple tasks feel harder than they should.

Now imagine that happening not once, but multiple times a day.

That’s what many students experience when each of their online courses is designed completely differently.

The Hidden Cost of Constant Adjustment

When students move from one course to another, they aren’t just switching content. They’re switching systems.

One instructor places assignments in the “Content” area. Another uses “Assignments.” A third buries them in weekly announcements. Navigation menus vary, module structures differ, and even the way instructions are written can feel inconsistent. Each transition requires students to pause, reorient, and figure out how this particular course works before they can begin engaging with the material.

This process may seem minor from the instructor’s perspective, but it carries a real cognitive cost. Research on cognitive load suggests that working memory is limited, and unnecessary mental effort—what we call extraneous cognitive load—can interfere with learning (Sweller, 1988; Sweller et al., 2011). When students are repeatedly forced to “relearn” how to navigate each course, they are using valuable mental resources that could otherwise be directed toward understanding the content.

Consistency Isn’t About Control—It’s About Clarity

It’s important to say this part out loud: consistency does not mean every course has to look identical or strip away instructor personality.

Instead, consistency provides a familiar structure that reduces uncertainty. When students know where to find assignments, how modules are organized, and what to expect from week to week, they can focus on the content rather than the process. This aligns with principles from user experience design, where predictable interfaces allow users to complete tasks more efficiently and with less frustration (Norman, 2013).

In other words, consistency doesn’t limit teaching—it supports learning.

When Everything Is Different, Everything Feels Harder

Consider the student taking four or five online courses at once.

Each course may be well-designed on its own, but when combined, the differences create friction. Students must remember multiple navigation paths, adjust to different organizational systems, and interpret varying expectations. Over time, this constant adjustment can lead to fatigue, errors, and missed information.

Studies in online learning environments have shown that clear organization and consistent structure are associated with higher student satisfaction and improved performance (Boling et al., 2012). When courses lack consistency, students often report feeling overwhelmed—not because the material is too difficult, but because accessing and managing it becomes unnecessarily complicated.

The Role of Templates and Shared Design Practices

This is where structured course design approaches, such as templates or master course shells, can make a meaningful difference.

Templates provide a starting point that ensures key elements—like navigation, module layout, and assignment placement—are predictable across courses. They don’t dictate content or teaching style, but they create a shared framework that reduces confusion. From an instructional design perspective, this supports alignment and usability while still allowing flexibility for discipline-specific needs.

Quality Matters, a widely used framework for online course design, emphasizes the importance of clear navigation and consistency in course structure as part of its standards for quality (Quality Matters, 2018). These principles are not about enforcing uniformity, but about creating environments where students can succeed without unnecessary barriers.

A Small Shift with a Big Impact

The goal isn’t perfection. It’s awareness.

When faculty begin to think beyond their individual course and consider the broader student experience, small design decisions start to matter more. Placing assignments in consistent locations, organizing modules in a predictable way, and using clear, repeated patterns can significantly reduce the mental effort required to navigate a course.

These changes don’t require a full redesign. They require a shift in perspective—from “How do I want to organize this?” to “How will students experience this?”

What’s Coming Next

In the next post, we’re going to zoom in on a very practical question:

Where should students click first?

Because even within a well-structured course, the entry point matters more than we often realize.

Final Thought

Your course doesn’t exist in isolation.

It’s part of a larger ecosystem of courses, expectations, and student responsibilities.

The more consistent and predictable that experience is…

The easier it becomes for students to focus on what really matters—learning.

Call to Action

Take a moment to look at your course alongside another course in your department.

Ask yourself:

Would a student immediately recognize how both courses work?

Or would they have to start over each time?

That answer tells you more than you might expect.

References (APA 7th Edition)

Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., & Stevens, M. (2012). Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(2), 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.006

Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and expanded ed.). Basic Books.

Quality Matters. (2018). Quality Matters higher education rubric (6th ed.). Quality Matters.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.

instructional design online course design Online Teaching higher education student experience online learning course navigation Faculty Development Learning Design student success course consistency learning experience